Some view this issue in two extremes. One extreme is an entirely hands off policy. They believe that poorer countries should not receive foreign aid, that they should pull themselves up by their own bootstraps. While this is a fair view, it is not always good to adopt. Some countries simply cannot help themselves; they need support to get them to a place where they can pick themselves up. The other end of the spectrum is that everybody needs all the help they can get, and that a powerful country (for instance, the United States of America) should be as involved in a country as possible. Once again, this is not good because this is considered infringing on a country's sovereignty. A country needs to operate without assistance in the long-term future. Forcing unwanted aid and assistance on a country creates resentment, tension and is counter productive. Therefore, striking a fine balance between ignoring the situation and mothering the country is critical. It's said that if you give a man a fish, he eats for a day. If you teach him to fish, he eats for a lifetime.
United Nations. Department of Public Information. PRESS CONFERNECE BY PERMANANT REPRESENTATIVE OF SUDAN ON INERNATIONAL CRIMANAL COURT'S ARREST OF PRESIDENT OMER HASSAN AL-BASHIR. United Nations. 4 Mar. 2009. Web. 21 Aug. 2010.
I like that you brought up the two extremes in your post. While there are always a lot o people who can ind a middle ground on issues, not just this one, the people we hear the most about are the people on both ends of the extreme, so I think its really good that you brought that idea up because it happens a lot in the world and so e need to be aware it.
ReplyDelete